This email will be abridged so you don't have to see increasingly wide quote boxes.
neo-Darwinian evolution is the most widely accepted explanation for how the diversity of life came into existence"]
[Regarding Kazim's statement that "
Majority is correct? That's extremely flawed. I'm sure you perhaps meant something differently?
Nope. This is not an argument from popularity, although you might regard it as an argument from authority. In brief, I am not a scientist, but I understand the scientific method and recognize that it relies on results that are repeatable and can be independently verified. I also recognize that among the people who devote themselves to the serious study of biology, i.e. published biologists, only a vanishingly small number of them have any beef with the claim that biological evolution occurred.
Science is based on converging consensus based on common repeatable observations. If you'd like me to explain the scientific method in more depth then I will.
[Responding to Kazim's statement that fossilization is a rare event]
However that was not my question. I was stating that in order for fossilization to occur, some pretty drastic things had to happen. So, what was this (these) process (processes) basically?
I'm sure you're fully capable of doing your own research. But here, let me google that for you.
[Regarding Kazim's remarks about the temporal proximity of pyramid building to the flood]
Well there is: " The building of the first temple can be dated to 950 B.C. +/- some small delta, placing the Flood around 2250 B.C. Unfortunately, the Egyptians (among others) have written records dating well back before 2250 B.C. (the Great Pyramid, for example dates to the 26th century B.C., 300 years before the Biblical date for the Flood). No sign in Egyptian inscriptions of this global flood around 2250 B.C." However the Flood occurred 4400.
Reference, please? Where are you getting these numbers? As I understand it, there are two perspectives. The young earth creationist view is based on numbers cooked up by Bishop Ussher, who concluded that the flood occurred in 2348 BC.
The position of the scientific community, on the other hand, is that there is no indication whatsoever that a global flood ever occurred.
[When called out for posting long lists of objections to science from web sites, without providing detail]
Haha, my bad. I admit, I was in a bit of a hurry, which caused me to get some points from book/site. I'll elaborate in a future message.
Okay. I've got time to wait.
[Further pressing for a reaction to the web site ostensibly showing ancient pictures of dinosaurs]
Yes it is subjective, however if you want to deny how amazingly (try to think objectively) accurate the paintings/carvings/etc looked, then whatever. How can someone do so with such accuracy? Has there been any other examples such as these? If it would've been a drawing of some random monster, then yea, so what? This is significant because they didn't know anything about the dinosaurs (supposedly), so how can they just so happen to draw such pictures?
1. There is actually good reason to believe that people found dinosaur bones in ancient times...
2. There is nothing inherent in evolution that says that the dinosaurs could not have survived past the presumed extinction event. It's unlikely, but wouldn't fundamentally change the scientific understanding of how evolution works.