tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33241741.post116094288200900974..comments2023-09-24T07:53:50.826-05:00Comments on The Atheist Experience™: Exploring the boundaries of church/state separationUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33241741.post-1161228072349125472006-10-18T22:21:00.000-05:002006-10-18T22:21:00.000-05:00I'm pretty sure the eighth circuit ruling that Sek...I'm pretty sure the eighth circuit ruling that Sekulow cited means that sexual harassment would fall in a different category from discussing religious beliefs.<BR/><BR/>I think that religious discussion is not necessarily identical to religious harassment. As an analogy, a coworker could come into your office and say "My daughter is selling girl scout cookies, would you like to buy some?" On the other hand, your boss could come in and say "Buy my daughter's cookies or else you'll never get that promotion!"<BR/><BR/>Both are requesting the same action, but one case is clearly workplace harassment and the other is not.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05324968314168283095noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33241741.post-1161125191046731212006-10-17T17:46:00.000-05:002006-10-17T17:46:00.000-05:00Russell quotes Jay Sekulow:"having a personal conv...Russell quotes Jay Sekulow:<BR/>"having a personal conversation during your break time about your faith, one on one, is not to be treated as contraband nor is it to be called 'inappropriate conversation'-even if somebody happens to overhear it.”<BR/><BR/>This seems inconsistent with the sexual harrassment jurisprudence that says that other kinds of overheard "inappropriate conversations" are not ok in the workplace. Why do people get a pass when they create a religiously hostile work environment?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com